What is the significance of Graham v. Connor?

The significance of Graham v. Connor lies in its establishment of the standard for determining the reasonableness of force used by law enforcement officers. This landmark Supreme Court case introduced the "objective reasonableness" standard, which is based on the perspective of a reasonable officer on the scene, rather than the officer's subjective intentions. This means that when assessing whether the use of force was reasonable, courts will consider the totality of the circumstances surrounding the incident, including the immediate threat to the officer or others, the severity of the crime at issue, and whether the suspect was actively resisting arrest or attempting to flee.

This ruling has profound implications for police accountability and the legal thresholds for justifying the use of force. It guides courts in evaluating cases of alleged excessive force, ensuring that officers are evaluated based on what a reasonable officer would have perceived and done under similar circumstances. By articulating these standards, Graham v. Connor provides critical legal clarity that shapes how law enforcement operates and how they are held accountable for their actions in the field.