Under Julian v. Randazzo, police may use reasonable force to:

The rationale behind the correct answer, which encompasses both preventing an escape and taking someone into custody, lies in the principles established in Julian v. Randazzo regarding the permissible use of force by law enforcement officers.

In law enforcement, the use of reasonable force is justified when it serves a lawful purpose, such as apprehending a suspect or ensuring that an individual is taken into custody appropriately and safely. The ruling in this case emphasizes that officers are allowed to use force when necessary to prevent a suspect from evading arrest, as it is essential to maintain public safety and uphold the law.

Moreover, the ability to take someone into custody legally involves not only the authority to do so but also the need for officers to ensure that their actions are effective and within the scope of reasonableness. When an individual resists arrest or attempts to escape, reasonable force may be necessary to fulfill the officer's duty to protect the community and enforce the law.

Thus, applying reasonable force to both prevent an escape and to take someone into custody reflects the legal principles recognized in the Julian v. Randazzo case, ensuring that officers can perform their responsibilities while still adhering to the standards of what constitutes reasonable and lawful use of force.